ESTHER MENELL'S BLOG

Month: March 2017

MY TEAM: memories of St Hilda’s

The heady news that my old college was in the running to win University Challenge reached me in the St Hilda’s newsletter just before Christmas.  With mounting excitement I read that ‘our unstoppable foursome’ had an ‘effortless 160 point lead’ and  ‘trounced’ the opposition!   For the first time ever, I had a taste of what my son – a Chelsea supporter – has felt most Saturdays for the last forty years.

That I should get caught up in the excitement about St Hilda’s victory makes no sense at all.  Oxford had been a major disappointment and, though I retain a mild affection for St Hilda’s itself, it is no more than that and it hasn’t increased over the years, in spite of my managing to ward off their requests for money.  Anne Elliott – my tutor, and also Val McDermid’s (more of this later) – would surely have found those begging phone calls unseemly.   Her handwritten letter, sent to each one of us as she approached retirement (or perhaps, some other occasion that threatened a present) asked that no one contribute more than three pounds.

This delicacy is typical of one of the gentlest of people and least effective of teachers. Those one-to-one tutorials (actually, one-to-two) in front of her fire, which always ended with her greeting that week’s essay with the exact same words: ‘That’s about the size of it,’ as she rekindled her cigarette in the embers, were to be recalled by generation after generation of Eng Lit students, Katherine Duncan Jones, the distinguished Shakespearean scholar, among them.

Also among them was Val McDermid, now captain of the victorious team.  She was brilliant.  Four square, as wholesome as a ripe apple, the answers bubbled out of her:  high culture, popular culture, whatever was thrown in the ring.  Not that she hogged the show. She just held it together.

Even as I watched this now celebrated alumna of St Hilda’s, I remembered her account – come across, I know not where – of arriving at Anne Elliott’s for the weekly tutorial, all fired up at having discovered the writings of Kate Millet, and Miss Elliott, who did not even consider the novel worthy of study, allowing her to let off steam before saying, gently, ‘Well, dear, perhaps it is time to get back to Wordsworth.’

Which she did.  But that isn’t where she was to stay forever after:  and if she hadn’t known who Oor Wallie and the Bruins were, I would never have experienced the thrill of my team winning.

 

LOOKING FOR JUSTICE

For the first time since my divorce hearing which, I think, took place there, I was at the Law Courts in the Strand the other day.   I had heard of a case coming up where I would have done exactly as the person on trial had done, so I had a particular interest in seeing and hearing how things panned out.

Determined to be there from the start and experience every step in the ancient procedure, from the entrance of the judge to his or her departure, I arrived in good time but, even so, managed to miss the first ten minutes, for I got lost in the building.  Street* wasn’t called Street for nothing.

It was entirely my fault, not theirs.   I had got through the frisking successfully, but didn’t have the details of the case which would have enabled the friendly man at the information desk to send me to the right Court.   Instead, he furnished me with the directions to Room 240 – the Administrative Court – where, he said, they know everything.   And so they did.

I have kept the half-sheet of A4 on which the directions to Room 240 had been typed, on what must surely have been a manual typewriter, so bold and homely is the type face.

       Go up a few steps turn right

       Go through 2 sets of doors

       Turn left

       Continue on until . . .

Good plain English and I, who have to hold a map upside down, if we are driving South, had no trouble following the instructions.

To be honest, I was not lost at all, lost only in the best sense, like lost in a book, as I made my way through this vast and wonderful building to find myself, at last, just where I was meant to be. But it turned out this office did not open its doors until the very moment at which the trial began.

Even so, given the choice between saturation in the marble density and calm of Street’s creation or being on time, I wouldn’t hesitate to choose the first.  The building itself exudes confidence in what goes on within its walls – badly needed in these days of the ‘so-called’ Judge. It does not seem absurd to Look for Justice here.

As for what took place in the court-room itself: that must wait for another day.

 

                                                                                    *George Edward Street, 1824-81, architect